Omniterra Pulse · Application 01

Build a site-wide baseline before instruments are placed.

Give geotechnical, monitoring, and instrumentation teams a white-label ground-motion baseline before they place sensors or expand a campaign.

Starts with
A site boundary, asset geometry, and review period.
You receive
A partner-ready, white-label Dated Ground-Movement Evidence Packet for one named site and decision date.
Product output / application view
Pulse ground-motion evidence surfaces used to plan a monitoring campaign.
Review motion history, acceleration, temporal coherence, coverage, and asset overlap in the same spatial view.
01 / Operational outcome
What improves

Add a finished ground-motion capability before crews and sensors are committed.

The workflow is organized around one operating question: Where should instruments go, what history belongs in the proposal, and which assets need the closest baseline review?
Benefit 01

Adds satellite ground-motion capability to the existing monitoring workflow

Output used

Ascending and descending motion history with derived East + Up components and geometry metrics

Benefit 02

Strengthens bids before field mobilization

Output used

Observability and confidence surfaces for sensor-placement discussions

Benefit 03

Creates a natural path from baseline evidence to instruments and recurring review

Output used

Partner-ready PDF, GIS layers, browser review, and technical handoff

02 / Operational context
Who uses it and when

Start with the operating team, trigger, and decision.

The technical scope starts from the operating moment, available observations, site geometry, time window, and the result the team needs to use.
Teams
Geotechnical consultancies, monitoring firms, survey teams, and instrumentation integrators.
Primary users
Managing director, monitoring lead, principal geotechnical engineer, or bid lead.
When it applies
A live bid, a new monitoring campaign, sparse existing instruments, or a client asking what should be monitored first.
Decision to support
Where should instruments go, what history belongs in the proposal, and which assets need the closest baseline review?
03 / Evidence and deliverables
Configured workflow

A partner-ready, white-label Dated Ground-Movement Evidence Packet for one named site and decision date.

The workflow connects named inputs, spatial processing, technical review, and reusable outputs for a defined site state or review period.
Pulse keeps the radar history, motion products, signal quality, and supplied assets in one reviewable site record.
Output set

What the team receives to support the decision.

01

Ascending and descending motion history with derived East + Up components and geometry metrics

Mapped across the available radar acquisition history for the selected review period.

02

Observability and confidence surfaces for sensor-placement discussions

Calculated over the supplied assets and site geometry for direct comparison.

03

Asset-linked hotspots, acceleration periods, coverage state, and processing notes

Displayed with temporal coherence, observation coverage, and reference-frame metadata.

04

Partner-ready PDF, GIS layers, browser review, and technical handoff

Provided in browser, document, and open spatial formats for downstream analysis.

04 / Related use cases

Bring the decision and the site evidence.
Define the record that can support it.

A partner-ready, white-label Dated Ground-Movement Evidence Packet for one named site and decision date.

Send the decision date, site or capture, review period, and the assets or work package under review. We will reply with the required inputs, processing scope, output formats, and next step.

Email Us

Performance cookies.