Benefit 01
Recovers independent history after the fact
Output used
Pre-event baseline and post-event movement comparison
Omniterra Pulse · Application 06
Reconstruct the ground-motion history around a major loss.
Add pre-event and post-event ground behavior to a major-loss investigation, with evidence strength and asset overlap kept explicit.
- Starts with
- A site boundary, asset geometry, and review period.
- You receive
- A rapid scoped chronology for the loss site, supplied milestones, and named assets under review.
Product output / application view
Review motion history, acceleration, temporal coherence, coverage, and asset overlap in the same spatial view.
01 / Operational outcome
What improves
Give experts an independent movement history after a major loss.
The workflow is organized around one operating question: Was supported movement present before the event, did the rate change, and where should forensic work concentrate?
Benefit 02
Narrows expert and inspection effort
Output used
Acceleration windows and acquisition-level evidence history
Benefit 03
Makes evidence gaps visible before positions harden
Output used
Claims-ready executive summary and expert technical handoff
02 / Operational context
Who uses it and when
Start with the operating team, trigger, and decision.
The technical scope starts from the operating moment, available observations, site geometry, time window, and the result the team needs to use.
Teams
Loss adjusters, insurers, forensic engineers, brokers, counsel, and large industrial owners.
Primary users
Major-loss director, adjuster, forensic lead, claims counsel, or risk director.
When it applies
A large claim involving settlement, slope movement, adjacent works, water, foundation concerns, or incomplete historic monitoring.
Decision to support
Was supported movement present before the event, did the rate change, and where should forensic work concentrate?
03 / Evidence and deliverables
Configured workflow
A rapid scoped chronology for the loss site, supplied milestones, and named assets under review.
The workflow connects named inputs, spatial processing, technical review, and reusable outputs for a defined site state or review period.
Pulse keeps the radar history, motion products, signal quality, and supplied assets in one reviewable site record.
Output set
What the team receives to support the decision.
01
Pre-event baseline and post-event movement comparison
Mapped across the available radar acquisition history for the selected review period.
02
Acceleration windows and acquisition-level evidence history
Calculated over the supplied assets and site geometry for direct comparison.
03
Asset overlap, confidence, observability, and coverage state
Displayed with temporal coherence, observation coverage, and reference-frame metadata.
04
Claims-ready executive summary and expert technical handoff
Provided in browser, document, and open spatial formats for downstream analysis.
04 / Related use cases
Bring the decision and the site evidence.
Define the record that can support it.
A rapid scoped chronology for the loss site, supplied milestones, and named assets under review.
Send the decision date, site or capture, review period, and the assets or work package under review. We will reply with the required inputs, processing scope, output formats, and next step.
(c) 2026 Omniterra Labs