Benefit 01
Reduces fragmented photo and video evidence
Output used
Dated capture QA and site-state record
Omniterra Atlas · Application 10
Keep the loss, scope, and repair in one comparable evidence record.
Capture pre-loss context where available, post-loss condition, remediation, and repair progress with source-linked findings and change.
- Starts with
- Photos, video, drone capture, plans, control, and prior site states.
- You receive
- A capture-to-evidence mission spanning the agreed loss and repair milestones.
Product output / application view
Inspect metric, visual, semantic, and temporal layers together, with direct links back to the capture and prior site states.
01 / Operational outcome
What improves
Keep loss, scope, and repair evidence comparable from first capture to close.
The workflow is organized around one operating question: What condition was visible, what changed through repair, which findings are supported, and where is further expert access required?
Benefit 02
Makes repair progress easier to compare and approve
Output used
Source-linked damage and condition findings
Benefit 03
Preserves unknowns and source support for expert review
Output used
Claims summary, evidence archive, open files, and reviewer handoff
02 / Operational context
Who uses it and when
Start with the operating team, trigger, and decision.
The technical scope starts from the operating moment, available observations, site geometry, time window, and the result the team needs to use.
Teams
Insurers, loss adjusters, restoration firms, forensic engineers, brokers, and asset owners.
Primary users
Claims director, adjuster, restoration lead, forensic engineer, or risk manager.
When it applies
A large property or industrial loss, inaccessible damage, repair dispute, milestone payment, or close-out review.
Decision to support
What condition was visible, what changed through repair, which findings are supported, and where is further expert access required?
03 / Evidence and deliverables
Configured workflow
A capture-to-evidence mission spanning the agreed loss and repair milestones.
The workflow connects named inputs, spatial processing, technical review, and reusable outputs for a defined site state or review period.
Atlas stores the capture, spatial products, findings, and comparison state as one versioned site record.
Output set
What the team receives to support the decision.
01
Dated capture QA and site-state record
Generated from the registered capture and stored in the current Atlas site version.
02
Source-linked damage and condition findings
Linked to source imagery, geometry, control, and review state.
03
Repair-progress and prior-state comparison
Structured for browser inspection, comparison, and repeat processing.
04
Claims summary, evidence archive, open files, and reviewer handoff
Exported in open spatial formats for GIS, engineering, and operations systems.
04 / Related use cases
Bring the decision and the site evidence.
Define the record that can support it.
A capture-to-evidence mission spanning the agreed loss and repair milestones.
Send the decision date, site or capture, review period, and the assets or work package under review. We will reply with the required inputs, processing scope, output formats, and next step.
(c) 2026 Omniterra Labs