Benefit 01
Adds independent dated evidence where inspections are episodic
Output used
Exact radar acquisition timeline and reproducible motion history
Omniterra Pulse · Application 02
Put the movement on the same timeline as the dispute.
Reconstruct dated movement and acceleration around works, notices, damage reports, and contractual milestones for claims and forensic review.
- Starts with
- A site boundary, asset geometry, and review period.
- You receive
- A scoped evidence chronology for one site, one written question, and one decision date.
Product output / application view
Review motion history, acceleration, temporal coherence, coverage, and asset overlap in the same spatial view.
01 / Operational outcome
What improves
Give claims teams a dated movement chronology before positions harden.
The workflow is organized around one operating question: What changed, when did the rate change, which assets overlap the supported signal, and what remains unknown?
Benefit 02
Keeps movement timing and contextual signals available for expert comparison
Output used
Acceleration windows aligned to supplied project milestones
Benefit 03
Gives project, technical, and claims teams one traceable record
Output used
Project summary, technical appendix, GIS layers, and signal-quality record
02 / Operational context
Who uses it and when
Start with the operating team, trigger, and decision.
The technical scope starts from the operating moment, available observations, site geometry, time window, and the result the team needs to use.
Teams
Construction claims teams, forensic engineers, delay and quantum consultancies, insurers, and counsel.
Primary users
Claims director, forensic engineering lead, partner, loss adjuster, or disputes counsel.
When it applies
A disputed damage date, adjacent works, dewatering, excavation, piling, settlement allegation, or missing site-wide baseline.
Decision to support
What changed, when did the rate change, which assets overlap the supported signal, and what remains unknown?
03 / Evidence and deliverables
Configured workflow
A scoped evidence chronology for one site, one written question, and one decision date.
The workflow connects named inputs, spatial processing, technical review, and reusable outputs for a defined site state or review period.
Pulse keeps the radar history, motion products, signal quality, and supplied assets in one reviewable site record.
Output set
What the team receives to support the decision.
01
Exact radar acquisition timeline and reproducible motion history
Mapped across the available radar acquisition history for the selected review period.
02
Acceleration windows aligned to supplied project milestones
Calculated over the supplied assets and site geometry for direct comparison.
03
Asset and building-level summaries with evidence-strength fields
Displayed with temporal coherence, observation coverage, and reference-frame metadata.
04
Project summary, technical appendix, GIS layers, and signal-quality record
Provided in browser, document, and open spatial formats for downstream analysis.
04 / Related use cases
Bring the decision and the site evidence.
Define the record that can support it.
A scoped evidence chronology for one site, one written question, and one decision date.
Send the decision date, site or capture, review period, and the assets or work package under review. We will reply with the required inputs, processing scope, output formats, and next step.
(c) 2026 Omniterra Labs