Benefit 01
Adds site history before or during rapid buildout
Output used
Long-baseline and recent motion comparison
Omniterra Pulse · Application 08
Screen the ground beneath the campus before uptime depends on it.
Review long-term and recent movement across pads, substations, cooling infrastructure, utilities, roads, and expansion areas.
- Starts with
- A site boundary, asset geometry, and review period.
- You receive
- A campus-wide ground-motion evidence review organized around supplied buildings, pads, utilities, and decision dates.
Product output / application view
Review motion history, acceleration, temporal coherence, coverage, and asset overlap in the same spatial view.
01 / Operational outcome
What improves
Focus campus civil and geotechnical work before ground behavior reaches critical operations.
The workflow is organized around one operating question: Which parts of the campus show supported movement or weak observability, and what deserves field confirmation?
Benefit 02
Focuses geotechnical and civil follow-up
Output used
Building, pad, substation, and corridor summaries
Benefit 03
Creates a defensible baseline for expansion and operation
Output used
Decision packet and open GIS layers for engineering and diligence
02 / Operational context
Who uses it and when
Start with the operating team, trigger, and decision.
The technical scope starts from the operating moment, available observations, site geometry, time window, and the result the team needs to use.
Teams
Data-center developers and operators, power developers, lenders, insurers, and technical advisors.
Primary users
Development director, site-selection lead, engineering director, lender engineer, or risk lead.
When it applies
Site selection, acquisition, refinancing, new halls, heavy equipment, utility expansion, or recurring pavement and drainage issues.
Decision to support
Which parts of the campus show supported movement or weak observability, and what deserves field confirmation?
03 / Evidence and deliverables
Configured workflow
A campus-wide ground-motion evidence review organized around supplied buildings, pads, utilities, and decision dates.
The workflow connects named inputs, spatial processing, technical review, and reusable outputs for a defined site state or review period.
Pulse keeps the radar history, motion products, signal quality, and supplied assets in one reviewable site record.
Output set
What the team receives to support the decision.
01
Long-baseline and recent motion comparison
Mapped across the available radar acquisition history for the selected review period.
02
Building, pad, substation, and corridor summaries
Calculated over the supplied assets and site geometry for direct comparison.
03
Acceleration, confidence, and observability review
Displayed with temporal coherence, observation coverage, and reference-frame metadata.
04
Decision packet and open GIS layers for engineering and diligence
Provided in browser, document, and open spatial formats for downstream analysis.
04 / Related use cases
Bring the decision and the site evidence.
Define the record that can support it.
A campus-wide ground-motion evidence review organized around supplied buildings, pads, utilities, and decision dates.
Send the decision date, site or capture, review period, and the assets or work package under review. We will reply with the required inputs, processing scope, output formats, and next step.
(c) 2026 Omniterra Labs