Omniterra Atlas · Application 08

Preserve the site state before the argument changes it.

Create a dated, source-linked record of site geometry, appearance, conditions, and unknowns for claims, handover, and warranty review.

Starts with
Photos, video, drone capture, plans, control, and prior site states.
You receive
A time-bound capture and site-record workflow with agreed questions, custody, and review criteria.
Product output / application view
Atlas dated reality record for construction claim review.
Inspect metric, visual, semantic, and temporal layers together, with direct links back to the capture and prior site states.
01 / Operational outcome
What improves

Preserve the site state before later work or disagreement changes the evidence.

The workflow is organized around one operating question: What did the site show at the relevant date, which measurements and findings are supported, and where does capture coverage leave gaps?
Benefit 01

Preserves evidence before conditions change

Output used

Dated capture manifest and reproducible world commit

Benefit 02

Gives all parties one traceable site record

Output used

Controlled geometry, visual record, findings, and unobserved areas

Benefit 03

Organizes dated observations for comparison across the project timeline

Output used

Executive claim pack plus open evidence archive

02 / Operational context
Who uses it and when

Start with the operating team, trigger, and decision.

The technical scope starts from the operating moment, available observations, site geometry, time window, and the result the team needs to use.
Teams
Owners, contractors, claims consultants, forensic engineers, insurers, lenders, and counsel.
Primary users
Commercial director, claims lead, forensic partner, project director, or disputes counsel.
When it applies
A disputed quantity or condition, termination, delayed handover, warranty issue, access loss, or impending remediation.
Decision to support
What did the site show at the relevant date, which measurements and findings are supported, and where does capture coverage leave gaps?
03 / Evidence and deliverables
Configured workflow

A time-bound capture and site-record workflow with agreed questions, custody, and review criteria.

The workflow connects named inputs, spatial processing, technical review, and reusable outputs for a defined site state or review period.
Atlas stores the capture, spatial products, findings, and comparison state as one versioned site record.
Output set

What the team receives to support the decision.

01

Dated capture manifest and reproducible world commit

Generated from the registered capture and stored in the current Atlas site version.

02

Controlled geometry, visual record, findings, and unobserved areas

Linked to source imagery, geometry, control, and review state.

03

Source links, reviewer state, methods, and processing metadata

Structured for browser inspection, comparison, and repeat processing.

04

Executive claim pack plus open evidence archive

Exported in open spatial formats for GIS, engineering, and operations systems.

04 / Related use cases

Bring the decision and the site evidence.
Define the record that can support it.

A time-bound capture and site-record workflow with agreed questions, custody, and review criteria.

Send the decision date, site or capture, review period, and the assets or work package under review. We will reply with the required inputs, processing scope, output formats, and next step.

Email Us

Performance cookies.