Monitor containment movement before it becomes a safety or compliance problem.
Omniterra Pulse isolates which dams, pads, and cell edges are behaving differently, where settlement or seepage-like patterns are emerging, and what deserves geotechnical follow-up before a containment issue becomes harder to manage.
Facility-scale deformation + moisture-linked change + embankment strain + acceleration screening -> anomaly zones, watchlists, compliance-oriented review layers.
Find hidden containment problems earlier, focus geotechnical follow-up, and support safety and compliance reporting across remote assets.
01 / Problem
Contained-mass facilities fail unevenly and often far from the nearest crew.
The asset is broad, remote, and expensive to inspect often.
Sparse site instrumentation and long travel times make it hard to maintain the same level of visibility across every crest, beach, pad, or cell edge.
The most important changes are often not visible from the access road.
Settlement, wetting-driven movement, and deformation pockets can build in a few localized areas long before they look like an obvious site-wide problem.
The operator still has to show that monitoring was systematic.
The product has to support safety, closure, and compliance workflows with a repeatable explanation of what changed, where, and how strongly.
02 / Solution
How Omniterra Pulse solves it.
Ranked anomaly zones across dams, pads, and cells
Narrow the broad facility response into the zones where deformation, wetness-linked change, and strain deserve closer geotechnical review.
A facility watchlist with trend context
Return ranked anomalies, timing and trend notes, and GIS-ready outputs that can move into site, safety, and compliance workflows.
Where to inspect, instrument, or escalate first
Support the next decision about which part of the facility gets a closer site check, more instrumentation, or higher-priority engineering attention.
Best fit for this workflow.
Best when a large, remote, slowly deforming facility has high-consequence failure modes and the next need is an anomaly shortlist.
Tailings facilities, heap leach pads, landfill cells, and other contained-mass assets
Best where deformation, saturation, or settlement changes can materially affect safety, closure, or compliance decisions.
Post-rain wetting, new lift placement, reclamation planning, seepage concerns, and unexplained settlement
Most useful when the buyer already has a facility concern but needs a wide-area triage layer before field follow-up.
A baseline map, a ranked anomaly list, and a short interpretation memo
The first pilot returns a facility-scale review that tells the operator where to look first and why those zones stand out.
Delivered as ranked anomaly zones, facility watchlists, and GIS-ready safety and compliance review layers.
Start with tailings and waste.
Request a pilot.
Send one site and the operating question around tailings and waste. We will reply with fit, timing, and a first Omniterra Pulse pilot scope.
The first step stays scoped: one site, one decision, one readable packet that supports the next inspection, maintenance, or monitoring choice.