Validate the InSAR signal.
Decide with independent evidence.
A fixed-price EUR 2,999 independent review for asset owners, insurers, consultants, and public agencies already buying InSAR monitoring. We confirm fit first, then re-run one monitored site from the raw satellite archive and deliver an independent motion surface, confidence notes, and comparison memo.
No useful comparison? No payment. We only proceed when archive coverage, geometry, and coherence can support a professional second baseline.
01 / Decision Risk
InSAR reports become business decisions.
A polished map can hide fragile assumptions.
Reference area, AOI boundary, time window, coherence threshold, orbit choice, and interpretation can all shape the final movement story an operations team receives.
Small processing choices can change the risk story.
Independent processing helps separate robust surface motion from weak coherence, geometry limits, reference-area effects, or interpretation drift.
The decision still lands with your team.
The vendor may be right. The business problem is making renewal, inspection, capex, insurance, or board decisions without an independent baseline.
02 / Moments That Need Evidence
When an InSAR question needs an independent baseline.
Before renewing a monitoring contract.
Use it when a recurring InSAR program is up for renewal and the buyer needs confidence that the current signal, limits, and conclusions hold up.
Before delaying work or sending crews.
Useful when a reported movement trend may change inspection priority, defer capital works, escalate engineering review, or reshape the field plan.
Before the result becomes evidence.
A comparison memo gives insurers, asset owners, consultants, and public agencies a concise independent baseline for high-stakes review.
03 / How It Works
One monitored site. One independent comparison.
Start with one monitored site.
Send the asset, AOI, current report context, and the decision you need to support. If confidentiality needs to come first, start with the site and work email.
We check whether comparison is useful.
We review archive availability, site geometry, expected coherence, and comparison value before payment. If the site is not a good fit, we say so before the review starts.
You get an independent comparison memo.
When the site supports it, we return an independent motion surface, confidence notes, and a memo covering agreement, mismatch, limits, and next questions.
Before the next renewal, capex decision, inspection plan, insurance review, dispute, or board memo, get an independent baseline your team can stand behind.